Researchers:
The objectives of the study are:
Abstract:
Urbanization, eliminating natural storages of the
watershed and changing permeable surface to impermeable surface such as
pavement and buildings roof, leads to rapid increment in peak flow and
runoff volume during rainfall events. Consequently, flash floods happen in
urban areas during a short duration rainfall. Department of Irrigation and
Drainage Malaysia (DID) has introduced in year 2000 the application of
“on-source control” approach to solve current flood problems in urban areas
in Malaysia. Infiltration system is one of methods that have been proposed
in Urban Stormwater Management Manual for Malaysia (MSMA) to control peak
flows and runoff volume.
The size of infiltration system and time for emptying the
system are sensitive to infiltration coefficient (Zakaria et al., 2003).
Hence, any uncertainty in the selection of infiltration coefficient value
may lead to significant inaccuracy in the design of the system. However,
infiltration coefficient is highly dependent on the in-situ soil condition.
Factors influencing the infiltration rate include the condition of the soil
surface and its vegetative cover, the properties of the soil (such as
porosity and hydraulic conductivity), the current moisture content of the
soil and the soil strata.
Unfortunately, database on infiltration coefficients for
local soil conditions have not been established yet. Without this database,
designs have to be based on infiltration coefficient developed by others
(such as USCS soil classification for USA) which may not be applicable for
Malaysian soil at all. In fact, a comprehensive and systematic database of
soil classification with respect to its infiltration capacity for major
cities in Malaysia is essential not only for infiltration system designs but
also for studying the applicable and effectiveness of infiltration system to
control floods in both the technical and economical aspects.
Based on the results of the infiltration tests that were carried out,
infiltration maps were plotted for Butterworth and Universiti Sains Malaysia
(USM) Engineering Campus, Nibong Tebal. The maps were plotted according to
the infiltration capacity of soil type for each area (Fazly et al., 2005).
Selected Publications:
-
Zakaria, N.A., Ab. Ghani, A., Abdullah, R., Mohd Sidek, L. & Ainan, A.
(2003). Bio-Ecological Drainage System (BIOECODS) for Water Quantity And
Quality Control, International Journal of River Basin Management,
International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research (IAHR),
Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 237-251. ISSN 1571-5124 <download>
-
Yusof, M. F., Zakaria, N. A., Ab.
Ghani, A., Abdullah, R. & Chang, C.K. (2005). Infiltration Study for
Urban Soil: Case Studies – Butterworth and Engineering Campus,
Universiti Sains Malaysia. XXXI IAHR Congress: Water Engineering for
the Future - Choice and Challenges, 11-16 September, Seoul, Korea,
pp. 1154-1162. ISBN: 8987898245 <download>

Study Area (a) Butterworth (b) USM Engineering Campus

Soil Sampling Using Hand Auger

Field Infiltration Test Using Double Ring Infiltrometer

(a) USM Engineering Campus
(b) Butterworth
Infiltration Curves
Infiltration Test Result for Butterworth
Location |
fo (mm/hr) |
fc (mm/hr) |
Fc (mm2) |
k (hr -1) |
Horton Equation (mm/hr) |
fo/ fc |
Kg. Lebai Tahir (zon 1) |
3250 |
1350 |
932.52 |
2.037 |
f = 1350 + 1900e-2.037
t |
2.407 |
Kg. Sungai Lokan (Zon 5) |
180 |
135 |
218.07 |
0.206 |
f = 135 + 45e-0.206 t |
1.33 |
Kg. Maklom ( Zon 5) |
1750 |
120 |
3791.1 |
0.430 |
f = 120 + 1630e-0.430
t |
14.58 |
Kg.Jawa ( Zon 6 ) |
460 |
96 |
604.14 |
0.603 |
f = 96 + 364e-0.603
t |
4.79 |
Taman Limbungan (zon 1) |
44 |
32 |
46.016 |
0.2608 |
f = 32 + 12e-0.2608t |
1.375 |
Tmn Chantek (zon 1) |
247 |
25 |
292.85 |
0.7581 |
f = 25 + 222e-0.7581t |
9.88 |
Tmn. Penisular (zon 1) |
640 |
120 |
742.61 |
0.7002 |
f = 120 + 520e-0.7002t |
5.33 |
Infiltration Test Result for USM Engineering Campus
Location |
fo (mm/hr) |
fc (mm/hr) |
Fc (mm2) |
k (hr -1) |
Horton Equation (mm/hr) |
fo/ fc |
O34 |
234.48 |
124.45 |
141.07 |
0.7799 |
f = 124.45 + 110e-0.7799t |
1.88 |
Q17 |
50.70 |
16.11 |
22.07 |
1.5673 |
f = 16.11 + 34.59e-1.5673t |
3.15 |
Q45 |
65.29 |
12.90 |
21.45 |
2.4427 |
f = 12.90 + 52.39e-2.4427t |
5.06 |
S40 |
650.84 |
254.41 |
322.15 |
1.2306 |
f = 254.41 + 396.43e-1.23106t |
2.56 |
T13 |
215.13 |
197.38 |
186.53 |
0.0952 |
f = 197.38 + 17.75e-0.0952t |
1.09 |
U24 |
774.63 |
165.70 |
266.38 |
2.2859 |
f = 165.70 + 608.93e-2.2859t |
4.67 |
U36 |
106.24 |
55.11 |
62.97 |
0.8120 |
f = 55.11 + 51.13e-0.8120t |
1.93 |

(a) Butterworth
(b) USM Engineering Campus
Infiltration Map
|